Scandal-Battered Utility Now Faces Specter Of Pricy Lawsuits!
FEATURED PHOTO: SAMUEL RANDAZZO, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE PUBLIC UTILITES COMMISSION OF OHIO
Yahoo.com, By Mark Gillispie-ASSOCIATED PRESS, Posted January 8th 2021
Ohio’s largest electric utility, its reputation battered by scandal, has been besieged by more than a dozen lawsuits filed by angry shareholders who include some of the country’s biggest institutional investors.
And, if history is a guide, FirstEnergy Corp. and its insurers could find themselves paying millions to settle those complaints, as the company did more than 15 years ago when confronted by lawsuits for lying about a dangerous hole in a reactor head at a nuclear power plant and for contributing to the largest blackout in U.S. history.
FirstEnergy and insurers for its corporate officers and board of directors paid out more than $100 million to settle lawsuits in 2004. It is far too early to estimate what settlements of the new lawsuits might total, but the potential payouts could far exceed those from 2004, given the losses shareholders claim to have suffered.
The latest lawsuits were filed as FirstEnergy became a central figure in what has been called the biggest corruption scandal in state history. The company is accused of secretly funding a $60 million bribery scheme aimed at winning a $1 billion legislative bailout in 2019 for two Ohio nuclear plants operated at the time by a wholly owned FirstEnergy subsidiary.
FirstEnergy’s stock price quickly plummeted around 40% after U.S. Attorney David DeVillers announced July 21 that then-Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and four others had been arrested on suspicion of having roles in the bribery scheme.
The first lawsuits were filed within a week and now total more than a dozen. The bulk have been filed in federal court in Columbus, with several filed in state court in Akron, where FirstEnergy is based.
The company is one of the largest electric utilities in the U.S., providing power to customers in parts of six states.
Darren Robbins, an attorney for the firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, said stockholder losses have been estimated at $10 billion.
“It’s a very ugly situation where a lot of people have been hurt very very badly in Ohio and around the world,” Robbins said. “From what we know, there’s a deeply troubling pattern and practice of misconduct at and around FirstEnergy and those affiliated with it. It’s not very often you have facts compelling enough for the speaker of a statehouse to be taken into custody.”
Robbins’ firm has been named by U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley as lead counsel for five shareholder class-action lawsuits naming current and former FirstEnergy executives as defendants. The lawsuits seek damages to be paid by the company itself for having misled investors about its involvement in the bribery scheme.
Nine federal complaints are known as shareholder derivative lawsuits, which are technically filed on behalf of FirstEnergy against some executives and members of its board of directors who stand accused of breaching their duty to protect shareholders and the company’s reputation.
Both types of lawsuits have been consolidated separately under one case but have not yet been certified by Marbley as class-action complaints, which is expected to happen in the next several months.
Attorneys for FirstEnergy have not yet responded to allegations made in the lawsuits. FirstEnergy spokesperson Jennifer Young said the company does not comment on pending litigation.
Shareholder lawsuits rarely go to trial, Robbins said, with settlements funded by targeted companies and insurers who cover executives and corporate officers.
That’s what occurred in 2004, when FirstEnergy settled lawsuits for concealing the hole at its Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station outside Toledo and for failing to adequately maintain its electric transmission system prior to the blackout that affected U.S. states and parts of Canada in August 2003.
A shareholder-class action was settled for $90 million, with insurers paying $72 million and FirstEnergy covering the balance. It settled derivative lawsuits later that year, with insurers paying $25 million to the company and FirstEnergy agreeing to reform its corporate structure.
Simon Peck, a business professor at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, said members of the board of the directors are supposed to be “a check on nefarious activities by insiders.”
“They are the guardians of the shareholders’ money,” Peck said. “I think it’s a legitimate question to ask how effective are these individuals in monitoring inside executives.”
Board members are elected by stockholders during annual meetings, which FirstEnergy held this year in May. FirstEnergy board members on average are paid around $250,000 in fees and stock options for a year’s service.
“If I was an angry stockholder, I would vote not to reelect board members,” Peck said.
FirstEnergy’s potential problems extend beyond the civil realm into the potential criminal.
The company is being investigated by the U.S. Justice Department, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Ohio Secretary of State’s Office. It also has been sued by the Ohio Attorney General’s Office.
Some of the same board members being sued are conducting their own internal investigation.
FirstEnergy CEO Chuck Jones and two other executives were fired in late October, with the company saying they “violated certain FirstEnergy polices and its code of conduct” but not providing details. Two of its top attorneys were dismissed in November.
Beyond the firings, FirstEnergy reported in November in a quarterly earnings report that unnamed executives in early 2019 had improperly paid $4 million to end a consulting contract in place since 2013 with an unnamed individual.
The description in the filing matched Samuel Randazzo, then the chair of the powerful Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and the Ohio Power Siting Board. Randazzo resigned Nov. 20, four days after the FBI searched his Columbus home and the day after the FirstEnergy filing.
Randazzo did not return telephone messages seeking comment.
